Cited by 765Software Reliability and Analysis ResearchSoftware Testing and Debugging TechniquesSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

Operational profiles in software-reliability engineering

Musa, J.D.·1993·IEEE Software

Abstract

A systematic approach to organizing the process of determining the operational profile for guiding software development is presented. The operational profile is a quantitative characterization of how a system will be used that shows how to increase productivity and reliability and speed development by allocating development resources to function on the basis of use. Using an operational profile to guide testing ensures that if testing is terminated and the software is shipped because of schedule constraints, the most-used operations will have received the most testing and the reliability level will be the maximum that is practically achievable for the given test time. For guiding regression testing, it efficiently allocates test cases in accordance with use, so the faults most likely to be found, of those introduced by changes, are the ones that have the most effect on reliability.>

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/52.199724

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our prior work on testing software that relies on data management systems has focused on data errors, whereas this work focuses on testing fairness.

    “Our prior work on testing software that relies on data management systems has focused on data errors [59, 60], whereas this work focuses on testing fairness.”

    From Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination (2017) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musa, J. D.
Venue
IEEE Software
Published
1993-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
14-32
ISSN
0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113004249
Cited by
765
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 29
FWCI
77.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Software (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
operational profile, software reliability, software testing, regression testing, software productivity, fault detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review