The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KLAIM: a kernel language for agents interaction and mobility
Abstract
We investigate the issue of designing a kernel programming language for mobile computing and describe KLAIM, a language that supports a programming paradigm where processes, like data, can be moved from one computing environment to another. The language consists of a core Linda with multiple tuple spaces and of a set of operators for building processes. KLAIM naturally supports programming with explicit localities. Localities are first-class data (they can be manipulated like any other data), but the language provides coordination mechanisms to control the interaction protocols among located processes. The formal operational semantics is useful for discussing the design of the language and provides guidelines for implementations. KLAIM is equipped with a type system that statically checks access right violations of mobile agents. Types are used to describe the intentions (read, write, execute, etc.) of processes in relation to the various localities. The type system is used to determine the operations that processes want to perform at each locality, and to check whether they comply with the declared intentions and whether they have the necessary rights to perform the intended operations at the specific localities. Via a series of examples, we show that many mobile code programming paradigms can be naturally implemented in our kernel language. We also present a prototype implementation of KLAIM in Java.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communicating Sequential Processes
Hoare, T. (1985) · Cited by 9,016
Milner, R. (1989) · Cited by 6,877
Penczek, W. (1990) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/0167-6423(90)90076-p · Cited by 3,954
A calculus of mobile processes, I
Milner, R., Parrow, J., & Walker, D. (1992) · Information and Computation · doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4 · Cited by 2,845
Generative communication in Linda
Gelernter, D. (1985) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/2363.2433 · Cited by 2,266
Communicating sequential processes
Boyle, R. (1985) · Data Processing · doi:10.1016/0011-684x(85)90108-x · Cited by 2,034
A calculus of mobile processes, II
Milner, R., Parrow, J., & Walker, D. (1992) · Information and Computation · doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90009-5 · Cited by 1,696
Carriero, N., & Gelernter, D. (1989) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/63334.63337 · Cited by 1,401
A calculus for cryptographic protocols: the spi calculus
Abadi, M., & Gordon, A. D. (1997) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/266420.266432 · Cited by 1,154
Berry, G., & Boudol, G. (1992) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90185-i · Cited by 813
Cited by
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G. L., & Pugliese, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 315-330
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161353020
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 31.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KLAIM: a kernel language for agents interaction and mobility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.685256
- The paper
- De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G. L., & Pugliese, R. (1998). KLAIM: a kernel language for agents interaction and mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.685256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.