The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic programming for detecting, tracking, and matching deformable contours
Abstract
The problem of segmenting an image into separate regions and tracking them over time is one of the most significant problems in vision. Terzopoulos et al. (1987) proposed an approach to detect the contour regions of complex shapes, assuming a user selected initial contour not very far from the desired solution. We propose to further explore the information provided by the user's selected points and apply an optimal method to detect contours which allows a segmentation of the image. The method is based on dynamic programming (DP), and applies to a wide variety of shapes. It is exact and not iterative. We also consider a multiscale approach capable of speeding up the algorithm by a factor of 20, although at the expense of losing the guaranteed optimality characteristic. The problem of tracking and matching these contours is addressed. For tracking, the final contour obtained at one frame is sampled and used as initial points for the next frame. Then, the same DP process is applied. For matching, a novel strategy is proposed where the solution is a smooth displacement field in which unmatched regions are allowed while cross vectors are not. The algorithm is again based on DP and the optimal solution is guaranteed. We have demonstrated the algorithms on natural objects in a large spectrum of applications, including interactive segmentation and automatic tracking of the regions of interest in medical images.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition
Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1978.1163055 · Cited by 6,727
Cited by
Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation
Boykov, Y., & Funka-Lea, G. (2006) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5 · Cited by 1,910
Computing geodesics and minimal surfaces via graph cuts
Boykov, & Kolmogorov (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238310 · Cited by 555
Exact optimization for markov random fields with convex priors
Ishikawa, H. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1233908 · Cited by 486
Design and perceptual validation of performance measures for salient object segmentation
Movahedi, V., & Elder, J. H. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2010.5543739 · Cited by 469
Facial animation parameters extraction and expression recognition using Hidden Markov Models
Pardàs, M., & Bonafonte, A. (2002) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/s0923-5965(02)00078-4 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Geiger, D., Gupta, A., Costa, L. A., & Vlontzos, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-302
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136706845
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic programming for detecting, tracking, and matching deformable contours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.368194
- The paper
- Geiger, D., Gupta, A., Costa, L. A., & Vlontzos, J. (1995). Dynamic programming for detecting, tracking, and matching deformable contours. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.368194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.