The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principal component analysis with missing data and its application to polyhedral object modeling
Abstract
Observation-based object modeling often requires integration of shape descriptions from different views. To overcome the problems of errors and their accumulation, we have developed a weighted least-squares (WLS) approach which simultaneously recovers object shape and transformation among different views without recovering interframe motion. We show that object modeling from a range image sequence is a problem of principal component analysis with missing data (PCAMD), which can be generalized as a WLS minimization problem. An efficient algorithm is devised. After we have segmented planar surface regions in each view and tracked them over the image sequence, we construct a normal measurement matrix of surface normals, and a distance measurement matrix of normal distances to the origin for all visible regions over the whole sequence of views, respectively. These two matrices, which have many missing elements due to noise, occlusion, and mismatching, enable us to formulate multiple view merging as a combination of two WLS problems. A two-step algorithm is presented. After surface equations are extracted, spatial connectivity among the surfaces is established to enable the polyhedral object model to be constructed. Experiments using synthetic data and real range images show that our approach is robust against noise and mismatching and generates accurate polyhedral object models.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
From few to many: illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and pose
Georghiades, A. S., Belhumeur, P. N., & Kriegman, D. J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.927464 · Cited by 4,912
Fast and Accurate Matrix Completion via Truncated Nuclear Norm Regularization
Hu, Y., Zhang, D., Ye, J., Li, X., & He, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.271 · Cited by 829
PPCA-Based Missing Data Imputation for Traffic Flow Volume: A Systematical Approach
Qu, L., Hu, J., Li, L., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2009.2026312 · Cited by 441
Damped Newton Algorithms for Matrix Factorization with Missing Data
Buchanan, A. M., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.118 · Cited by 299
Capturing and animating skin deformation in human motion
Park, S. I., & Hodgins, J. K. (2006) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1141911.1141970 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Shum, H.-Y., Ikeuchi, K., & Reddy, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 854-867
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147000446
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal component analysis with missing data and its application to polyhedral object modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.406651
- The paper
- Shum, H.-Y., Ikeuchi, K., & Reddy, R. (1995). Principal component analysis with missing data and its application to polyhedral object modeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.406651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.