The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reliable online human signature verification systems
Abstract
Online dynamic signature verification systems were designed and tested. A database of more than 10,000 signatures in (x(t), y(t))-form was acquired using a graphics tablet. We extracted a 42-parameter feature set at first, and advanced to a set of 49 normalized features that tolerate inconsistencies in genuine signatures while retaining the power to discriminate against forgeries. We studied algorithms for selecting and perhaps orthogonalizing features in accordance with the availability of training data and the level of system complexity. For decision making we studied several classifiers types. A modified version of our majority classifier yielded 2.5% equal error rate and, more importantly, an asymptotic performance of 7% false acceptance rate at zero false rejection rate, was robust to the speed of genuine signatures, and used only 15 parameter features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frank, M., Biedert, R., Ma, E., Martinovic, I., & Song, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2225048 · Cited by 844
ZHANG, Z. (1999) · International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1142/s0218001499000495 · Cited by 146
Sinha, P. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn949 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, L. L., Berger, T., & Aviczer, E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-647
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105881518
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable online human signature verification systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.506415
- The paper
- Lee, L. L., Berger, T., & Aviczer, E. (1996). Reliable online human signature verification systems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.506415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.