The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking
Abstract
Our goal is to develop a visual monitoring system that passively observes moving objects in a site and learns patterns of activity from those observations. For extended sites, the system will require multiple cameras. Thus, key elements of the system are motion tracking, camera coordination, activity classification, and event detection. In this paper, we focus on motion tracking and show how one can use observed motion to learn patterns of activity in a site. Motion segmentation is based on an adaptive background subtraction method that models each pixel as a mixture of Gaussians and uses an online approximation to update the model. The Gaussian distributions are then evaluated to determine which are most likely to result from a background process. This yields a stable, real-time outdoor tracker that reliably deals with lighting changes, repetitive motions from clutter, and long-term scene changes. While a tracking system is unaware of the identity of any object it tracks, the identity remains the same for the entire tracking sequence. Our system leverages this information by accumulating joint co-occurrences of the representations within a sequence. These joint co-occurrence statistics are then used to create a hierarchical binary-tree classification of the representations. This method is useful for classifying sequences, as well as individual instances of activities in a site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
A survey of appearance models in visual object tracking
Li, X., Hu, W., Shen, C., Zhang, Z., Dick, A., & Hengel, A. V. D. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2508037.2508039 · Cited by 705
Trajectory-Based Anomalous Event Detection
Piciarelli, C., Micheloni, C., & Foresti, G. L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2008.2005599 · Cited by 532
Discovering Activities to Recognize and Track in a Smart Environment
Rashidi, P., Cook, D. J., Holder, L. B., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2010.148 · Cited by 462
Learning Motion Patterns of People for Compliant Robot Motion
Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cielniak, G., & Thrun, S. (2005) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364904048962 · Cited by 399
Ontology‐based activity recognition in intelligent pervasive environments
Chen, L., & Nugent, C. (2009) · International Journal of Web Information Systems · doi:10.1108/17440080911006199 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Stauffer, C., & Grimson, W. E. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 747-757
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111918405
- Cited by
- 3,248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.