The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geometric camera calibration using circular control points
Abstract
Modern CCD cameras are usually capable of a spatial accuracy greater than 1/50 of the pixel size. However, such accuracy is not easily attained due to various error sources that can affect the image formation process. Current calibration methods typically assume that the observations are unbiased, the only error is the zero-mean independent and identically distributed random noise in the observed image coordinates, and the camera model completely explains the mapping between the 3D coordinates and the image coordinates. In general, these conditions are not met, causing the calibration results to be less accurate than expected. In the paper, a calibration procedure for precise 3D computer vision applications is described. It introduces bias correction for circular control points and a nonrecursive method for reversing the distortion model. The accuracy analysis is presented and the error sources that can reduce the theoretical accuracy are discussed. The tests with synthetic images indicate improvements in the calibration results in limited error conditions. In real images, the suppression of external error sources becomes a prerequisite for successful calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
Tsai, R. (1987) · IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/jra.1987.1087109 · Cited by 5,838
Linear algebra and its applications
(1989) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(89)90164-x · Cited by 2,001
(2018) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110542400 · Cited by 1,876
Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation
Weng, J., Cohen, P., & Herniou, M. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.159901 · Cited by 1,757
Slama, C. C., Theurer, C. B., & Henriksen, S. W. (1980) · American Society of Photogrammetry eBooks · Cited by 856
Lenz, R. K., & Tsai, R. Y. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.6781 · Cited by 557
Decomposition of transformation matrices for robot vision
Ganapathy, S. (2005) · Proceedings. 1984 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1984.1087163 · Cited by 246
Decomposition of transformation matrices for robot vision
Ganapathy, S. (1984) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/0167-8655(84)90007-2 · Cited by 110
What is the center of the image?
Willson, R. G., & Shafer, S. A. (2002) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993.341035 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Lagudi, A., Bianco, G., Muzzupappa, M., & Bruno, F. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16040536 · Cited by 43
Steger, C. (2017) · Handbook of Machine and Computer Vision · doi:10.1002/9783527413409.ch9 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Heikkila, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1066-1077
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157641950
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geometric camera calibration using circular control points. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.879788
- The paper
- Heikkila, J. (2000). Geometric camera calibration using circular control points. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.879788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.