Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Call admission control schemes: a review

Perros, H.G., Elsayed, K.M.·1996·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

Over the last few years, a substantial number of call admission control (CAC) schemes have been proposed for ATM networks. We review the salient features of some of these algorithms. Also, we quantitatively compare the performance of three of these schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/35.544197

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Perros, H. G., & Elsayed, K. M.
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
1996
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
82-91
ISSN
0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964301070
Cited by
270
References
7
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Call admission control schemes: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/35.544197
The paper
Perros, H. G., & Elsayed, K. M. (1996). Call admission control schemes: a review. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/35.544197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.