The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview
Abstract
Remote sensing from satellite or airborne platforms of land or sea surfaces in the visible and near infrared is strongly affected by the presence of the atmosphere along the path from Sun to target (surface) to sensor. This paper presents 6S (Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum), a computer code which can accurately simulate the above problems. The 6S code is an improved version of 5S (Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum), developed by the Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique ten years ago. The new version now permits calculations of near-nadir (down-looking) aircraft observations, accounting for target elevation, non lambertian surface conditions, and new absorbing species (CH/sub 4/, N/sub 2/O, CO). The computational accuracy for Rayleigh and aerosol scattering effects has been improved by the use of state-of-the-art approximations and implementation of the successive order of scattering (SOS) algorithm. The step size (resolution) used for spectral integration has been improved to 2.5 nm. The goal of this paper is not to provide a complete description of the methods used as that information is detailed in the 6S manual, but rather to illustrate the impact of the improvements between 5S and 6S by examining some typical remote sensing situations. Nevertheless, the 6S code has still limitations. It cannot handle spherical atmosphere and as a result, it cannot be used for limb observations. In addition, the decoupling the authors are using for absorption and scattering effects does not allow to use the code in presence of strong absorption bands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance
Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600746456 · Cited by 3,402
Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J. ‐., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R. J., Fisher, M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., et al. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd011115 · Cited by 608
Brown, M. E., Pinzon, J. E., Didan, K., Morisette, J. T., & Tucker, C. J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2005.860205 · Cited by 367
What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture?
Hunt, E. R., & Daughtry, C. S. T. (2018) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1410300 · Cited by 325
Impact of atmospheric aerosol from biomass burning on Amazon dry-season drought
Bevan, S. L., North, P. R. J., Grey, W. M. F., Los, S. O., & Plummer, S. E. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd011112 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Vermote, E. F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M., & Morcette, J.-J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 675-686
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125763679
- Cited by
- 3,178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 69.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.581987
- The paper
- Vermote, E. F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M., & Morcette, J.-J. (1997). Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.