The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection
Abstract
Image misregistration has become one of the significant bottlenecks for improving the accuracy of multisource data analysis, such as data fusion and change detection. In this paper, the effects of misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection were systematically investigated and quantitatively evaluated. This simulation research focused on two interconnected components. In the first component, the statistical properties of the multispectral difference images were evaluated using semivariograms when multitemporal images were progressively misregistered against themselves and each other to investigate the band, temporal, and spatial frequency sensitivities of change detection to image misregistration. In the second component, the ellipsoidal change detection technique, based on the Mahalanobis distance of multispectral difference images, was proposed and used to progressively detect the land cover transitions at each misregistration stage for each pair of multitemporal images. The impact of misregistration on change detection was then evaluated in terms of the accuracy of change detection using the output from the ellipsoidal change detector. The experimental results using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery are presented. It is interesting to notice that, among the seven TM bands, band 4 (near-infrared channel) is the most sensitive to misregistration when change detection is concerned. The results from false change analysis indicate a substantial degradation in the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection due to misregistration. It is shown that a registration accuracy of less than one-fifth of a pixel is required to achieve a change detection error of less than 10%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haralock, R. M., & Shapiro, L. G. (1991) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 3,933
Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data
SINGH, A. (1989) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431168908903939 · Cited by 3,849
Introductory Digital Image Processing
Jensen, J. R. (2004) · Cited by 1,096
Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery
Coppin, P. R., & Bauer, M. E. (1996) · Remote Sensing Reviews · doi:10.1080/02757259609532305 · Cited by 677
The impact of misregistration on change detection
Townshend, J. R. G., Justice, C. O., Gurney, C., & McManus, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.175340 · Cited by 504
Trucco, E. (1995) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-1995-8111 · Cited by 472
LANDSAT-4 MSS And Thematic Mapper Data Quality And Information Content Analysis
Anuta, P. E., Bartolucci, L. A., Dean, M. E., Lozano-García, D. F., Malaret, E., McGillem, C. D., Valdés, J., & Valenzuela, C. R. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.1984.350595 · Cited by 61
Coincident bit counting-a new criterion for image registration
Chiang, J. Y., & Sullivan, B. J. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.222663 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Accuracy validation and comparison of global digital elevation models over Croatia
Varga, M., & Bašić, T. (2015) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2014.994720 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, X., & Khorram, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1566-1577
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161001197
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 23.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.718860
- The paper
- Dai, X., & Khorram, S. (1998). The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.718860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.