The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition
Open accessAbstract
The standard data fusion methods may not be satisfactory to merge a high-resolution panchromatic image and a low-resolution multispectral image because they can distort the spectral characteristics of the multispectral data. The authors developed a technique, based on multiresolution wavelet decomposition, for the merging and data fusion of such images. The method presented consists of adding the wavelet coefficients of the high-resolution image to the multispectral (low-resolution) data. They have studied several possibilities concluding that the method which produces the best results consists in adding the high order coefficients of the wavelet transform of the panchromatic image to the intensity component (defined as L=(R+G+B)/3) of the multispectral image. The method is, thus, an improvement on standard intensity-hue-saturation (IHS or LHS) mergers. They used the "a trous" algorithm which allows the use of a dyadic wavelet to merge nondyadic data in a simple and efficient scheme. They used the method to merge SPOT and LANDSAT/sup TM/ images. The technique presented is clearly better than the IHS and LHS mergers in preserving both spectral and spatial information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Cited by
Multi-Focus Image Fusion: Algorithms, Evaluation, and a Library
Zafar, R., Farid, M. S., & Khan, M. H. (2020) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging6070060 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunez, J., Otazu, X., Fors, O., Prades, A., Pala, V., & Arbiol, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1204-1211
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152254169
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.