The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit
Abstract
As the number of spectral bands of high-spectral resolution data increases, the ability to detect more detailed classes should also increase, and the classification accuracy should increase as well. Often the number of labelled samples used for supervised classification techniques is limited, thus limiting the precision with which class characteristics can be estimated. As the number of spectral bands becomes large, the limitation on performance imposed by the limited number of training samples can become severe. A number of techniques for case-specific feature extraction have been developed to reduce dimensionality without loss of class separability. Most of these techniques require the estimation of statistics at full dimensionality in order to extract relevant features for classification. If the number of training samples is not adequately large, the estimation of parameters in high-dimensional data will not be accurate enough. As a result, the estimated features may not be as effective as they could be. This suggests the need for reducing the dimensionality via a preprocessing method that takes into consideration high-dimensional feature-space properties. Such reduction should enable the estimation of feature-extraction parameters to be more accurate. Using a technique referred to as projection pursuit (PP), such an algorithm has been developed. This technique is able to bypass many of the problems of the limitation of small numbers of training samples by making the computations in a lower-dimensional space, and optimizing a function called the projection index. A current limitation of this method is that, as the number of dimensions increases, it is likely that a local maximum of the projection index will be found that does not enable one to fully exploit hyperspectral-data capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Huber, P. J. (1985) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176349519 · Cited by 1,277
Constructing optimal binary decision trees is NP-complete
Hyafil, L., & Rivest, R. L. (1976) · Information Processing Letters · doi:10.1016/0020-0190(76)90095-8 · Cited by 959
Cited by
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines
Melgani, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.831865 · Cited by 4,411
Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data
Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, G., & Gu, Y. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2329330 · Cited by 2,679
Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network
Chen, Y., Zhao, X., & Jia, X. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2015.2388577 · Cited by 1,259
Nielsen, A. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.888195 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Jimenez, L. O., & Landgrebe, D. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2653-2667
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109395398
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.803413
- The paper
- Jimenez, L. O., & Landgrebe, D. A. (1999). Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.803413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.