Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 746

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Regularized Iteratively Reweighted MAD Method for Change Detection in Multi- and Hyperspectral Data

Open access
Nielsen, Allan Aasbjerg·2007·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

This paper describes new extensions to the previously published multivariate alteration detection (MAD) method for change detection in bi-temporal, multi- and hypervariate data such as remote sensing imagery. Much like boosting methods often applied in data mining work, the iteratively reweighted (IR) MAD method in a series of iterations places increasing focus on "difficult" observations, here observations whose change status over time is uncertain. The MAD method is based on the established technique of canonical correlation analysis: for the multivariate data acquired at two points in time and covering the same geographical region, we calculate the canonical variates and subtract them from each other. These orthogonal differences contain maximum information on joint change in all variables (spectral bands). The change detected in this fashion is invariant to separate linear (affine) transformations in the originally measured variables at the two points in time, such as 1) changes in gain and offset in the measuring device used to acquire the data, 2) data normalization or calibration schemes that are linear (affine) in the gray values of the original variables, or 3) orthogonal or other affine transformations, such as principal component (PC) or maximum autocorrelation factor (MAF) transformations. The IR-MAD method first calculates ordinary canonical and original MAD variates. In the following iterations we apply different weights to the observations, large weights being assigned to observations that show little change, i.e., for which the sum of squared, standardized MAD variates is small, and small weights being assigned to observations for which the sum is large. Like the original MAD method, the iterative extension is invariant to linear (affine) transformations of the original variables. To stabilize solutions to the (IR-)MAD problem, some form of regularization may be needed. This is especially useful for work on hyperspectral data. This paper describes ordinary two-set canonical correlation analysis, the MAD transformation, the iterative extension, and three regularization schemes. A simple case with real Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data at one point in time and (partly) constructed data at the other point in time that demonstrates the superiority of the iterative scheme over the original MAD method is shown. Also, examples with SPOT High Resolution Visible data from an agricultural region in Kenya, and hyperspectral airborne HyMap data from a small rural area in southeastern Germany are given. The latter case demonstrates the need for regularization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2006.888195

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.024 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.024
  2. hilger, 2001, Exploratory analysis of multivariate data Unsupervised image segmentation and data driven linear and nonlinear decomposition
  3. 10.1080/01431160500222608 · doi:10.1080/01431160500222608
  4. 10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469864 · doi:10.1109/amtrsi.2005.1469864
  5. canty, 2004, unsupervised classification of changes in multispectral satellite imagery, Proc SPIE 10th Int Symp Remote Sensing
  6. 10.2307/2288473 · DOI
  7. windfeld, 1992, Application of computer intensive data analysis Methods to the analysis of digital images and spatial data
  8. 10.1016/0034-4257(86)90015-5 · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(86)90015-5
  9. 10.1109/WARSD.2003.1295181 · doi:10.1109/warsd.2003.1295181
  10. 10.2307/2334380 · DOI
  11. nielsen, 2005, an iterative extension to the mad transformation for change detection in multi- and hyperspectral remote sensing data, 1st EARSel Workshop Imaging Spectroscopy
  12. nielsen, 2004, hyperspectral data, change detection and the mad transformation, 12th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Association Conf
  13. cocks, 1998, the hymap airborne hyperspectral sensor: the system, calibration, and performance, Proc 1st EARSel Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, 37
  14. wiemker, 1997, unsupervised robust change detection in multispectral imagery using spectral and spatial features, Proc 2nd Int Airborne Remote Sensing Conf Exhibition, i, 640
  15. haverkamp, 2003, Change detection using IKONOS imagery
  16. niemeyer, 2003, pixel-based and object-oriented change detection analysis using high-resolution imagery, 25th Symp Safeguards and Nuclear Material Management
  17. niemeyer, 2004, Improvements of Object-Oriented Procedures for Detecting and Interpreting Changes Within Nuclear Facilities
  18. fung, 1987, application of principal components analysis to change detection, Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 53, 1649
  19. 10.1080/07038992.1993.10855147 · doi:10.1080/07038992.1993.10855147
  20. switzer, 1984, Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors for Multivariate Spatial Imagery Tech Rep 6
  21. 2003, analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, MultiTemp Conf
  22. 2001, analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, MultiTemp Conf
  23. nielsen, 1994, Analysis of regularly and irregularly sampled spatial multivariate and multi-temporal data
  24. 2005, analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, MultiTemp Conf
  25. nielsen, 1997, Multivariate alteration detection (mad) in multispectral bi-temporal image data a new approach to change detection studies Tech Rep 1997-11
  26. 10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469864 · doi:10.1109/amtrsi.2005.1469864
  27. 10.1007/978-3-642-60105-7_4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60105-7_4
  28. nielsen, 2003, change detection by the mad method in hyperspectral image data, Proc 3rd EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, 115
  29. zhang, 2004, robust approach to the mad change detection method, Proc SPIE 10th Int Symp Remote Sensing, 5574, 184
  30. 10.1109/36.789651 · doi:10.1109/36.789651

Cited by

See all 746

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, A. A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2007-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
463-478
ISSN
1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998595580
Cited by
746
References
35
FWCI
29.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Regularized Iteratively Reweighted MAD Method for Change Detection in Multi- and Hyperspectral Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2006.888195
The paper
Nielsen, A. A. (2007). The Regularized Iteratively Reweighted MAD Method for Change Detection in Multi- and Hyperspectral Data. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2006.888195

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.