Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images

Sahiner, B., Heang-Ping Chan, Petrick, N., Datong Wei, Helvie, M.A., Adler, D.D., Goodsitt, M.M.·1996·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

The authors investigated the classification of regions of interest (ROI's) on mammograms as either mass or normal tissue using a convolution neural network (CNN). A CNN is a backpropagation neural network with two-dimensional (2-D) weight kernels that operate on images. A generalized, fast and stable implementation of the CNN was developed. The input images to the CNN were obtained from the ROI's using two techniques. The first technique employed averaging and subsampling. The second technique employed texture feature extraction methods applied to small subregions inside the ROI. Features computed over different subregions were arranged as texture images, which were subsequently used as CNN inputs. The effects of CNN architecture and texture feature parameters on classification accuracy were studied. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to evaluate the classification accuracy. A data set consisting of 168 ROIs containing biopsy-proven masses and 504 ROI's containing normal breast tissue was extracted from 168 mammograms by radiologists experienced in mammography. This data set was used for training and testing the CNN. With the best combination of CNN architecture and texture feature parameters, the area under the test ROC curve reached 0.87, which corresponded to a true-positive fraction of 90% at a false positive fraction of 31%. The authors' results demonstrate the feasibility of using a CNN for classification of masses and normal tissue on mammograms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/42.538937

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Sahiner, B., Chan, H.-P., Petrick, N., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Adler, D. D., & Goodsitt, M. M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
1996
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
598-610
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988452762
Cited by
420
References
2
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.538937
The paper
Sahiner, B., Chan, H.-P., Petrick, N., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Adler, D. D., & Goodsitt, M. M. (1996). Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.538937

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.