The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction
Abstract
Iterative deblurring methods using the expectation maximization (EM) formulation and the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART), respectively, are adapted for metal artifact reduction in medical computed tomography (CT). In experiments with synthetic noise-free and additive noisy projection data of dental phantoms, it is found that both simultaneous iterative algorithms produce superior image quality as compared to filtered backprojection after linearly fitting projection gaps. Furthermore, the EM-type algorithm converges faster than the ART-type algorithm in terms of either the I-divergence or Euclidean distance between ideal and reprojected data in the authors' simulation. Also, for a given iteration number, the EM-type deblurring method produces better image clarity but stronger noise than the ART-type reconstruction. The computational complexity of EM- and ART-based iterative deblurring is essentially the same, dominated by reprojection and backprojection. Relevant practical and theoretical issues are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging
Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (2001) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719277 · Cited by 5,809
Cited by
You, C., Cong, W., Vannier, M. W., Saha, P. K., Hoffman, E. A., Wang, G., Li, G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Shan, H., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2922960 · Cited by 459
Self-citationIterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study
Nuyts, J., Man, B. D., Dupont, P., Defrise, M., Suetens, P., & Mortelmans, L. (1998) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/003 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G., Snyder, D. L., O'Sullivan, J. A., & Vannier, M. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 657-664
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095757123
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.538943
- The paper
- Wang, G., Snyder, D. L., O'Sullivan, J. A., & Vannier, M. W. (1996). Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.538943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.