The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion
Abstract
We present the use of an entropy focus criterion to enable automatic focusing of motion corrupted magnetic resonance images. We demonstrate the principle using illustrative examples from cooperative volunteers. Our technique can determine unknown patient motion or use knowledge of motion from other measures as a starting estimate. The motion estimate is used to compensate the acquired data and is iteratively refined using the image entropy. Entropy focuses the whole image principally by favoring the removal of motion induced ghosts and blurring from otherwise dark regions of the image. Using only the image data, and no special hardware or pulse sequences, we demonstrate correction for arbitrary rigid-body translational motion in the imaging plane and for a single rotation. Extension to three-dimensional (3-D) and more general motion should be possible. The algorithm is able to determine volunteer motion well. The mean absolute deviation between algorithm and navigator-echo-determined motion is comparable to the displacement step size used in the algorithm. Local deviations from the recorded motion or navigator-determined motion are explained and we indicate how enhanced focus criteria may be derived. In all cases we were able to compensate images for patient motion, reducing blurring and ghosting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MRIQC: Advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites
Esteban, O., Birman, D., Schaer, M., Koyejo, O. O., Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184661 · Cited by 920
Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II
Di Martino, A., O’Connor, D., Chen, B., Alaerts, K., Anderson, J. S., Assaf, M., Balsters, J. H., Baxter, L., Beggiato, A., Bernaerts, S., et al. (2017) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.10 · Cited by 710
Alexander-Bloch, A., Clasen, L., Stockman, M., Ronan, L., Lalonde, F., Giedd, J., & Raznahan, A. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23180 · Cited by 178
Automated reference-free detection of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images
Küstner, T., Liebgott, A., Mauch, L., Martirosian, P., Bamberg, F., Nikolaou, K., Yang, B., Schick, F., & Gatidis, S. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10334-017-0650-z · Cited by 102
Multicenter stability of resting state fMRI in the detection of Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic MCI
Teipel, S. J., Wohlert, A., Metzger, C., Grimmer, T., Sorg, C., Ewers, M., Meisenzahl, E., Klöppel, S., Borchardt, V., Grothe, M. J., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.018 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, D., Hill, D. L. G., Stoyle, P. N. R., Summers, P. E., & Keevil, S. F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 903-910
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104434712
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.650886
- The paper
- Atkinson, D., Hill, D. L. G., Stoyle, P. N. R., Summers, P. E., & Keevil, S. F. (1997). Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.650886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.