The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We present a fully automated process for segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance (MR) images. This hybrid neural network method uses a Kohonen self-organizing neural network for segmentation and a multilayer backpropagation neural network for classification. To separate different tissue types, this process uses the standard T1-, T2-, and PD-weighted MR images acquired in clinical examinations. Volumetric measurements of brain structures, relative to intracranial volume, were calculated for an index transverse section in 14 normal subjects (median age 25 years; seven male, seven female). This index slice was at the level of the basal ganglia, included both genu and splenium of the corpus callosum, and generally, showed the putamen and lateral ventricle. An intraclass correlation of this automated segmentation and classification of tissues with the accepted standard of radiologist identification for the index slice in the 14 volunteers demonstrated coefficients (ri) of 0.91, 0.95, and 0.98 for white matter, gray matter, and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), respectively. An analysis of variance for estimates of brain parenchyma volumes in five volunteers imaged five times each demonstrated high intrasubject reproducibility with a significance of at least p < 0.05 for white matter, gray matter, and white/gray partial volumes. The population variation, across 14 volunteers, demonstrated little deviation from the averages for gray and white matter, while partial volume classes exhibited a slightly higher degree of variability. This fully automated technique produces reliable and reproducible MR image segmentation and classification while eliminating intra- and interobserver variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Cited by
Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation
Pham, D. L., Xu, C., & Prince, J. L. (2000) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315 · Cited by 2,341
f-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks
Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S. M., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.01.010 · Cited by 1,545
Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review
Asgari Taghanaki, S., Abhishek, K., Cohen, J. P., Cohen-Adad, J., & Hamarneh, G. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09854-1 · Cited by 870
State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation
Gordillo, N., Montseny, E., & Sobrevilla, P. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002 · Cited by 697
Reddick, W. E., White, H. A., Glass, J. O., Wheeler, G. C., Thompson, S. J., Gajjar, A., Leigh, L., & Mulhern, R. K. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11355 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Cook, E. N., Elkin, T. D., & Deaton, R. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 911-918
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2615412239
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.650887
- The paper
- Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Cook, E. N., Elkin, T. D., & Deaton, R. J. (1997). Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.650887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.