The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental model relating white matter volume to neurocognitive deficits in pediatric brain tumor survivors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that, among survivors of pediatric brain tumors, the association between reduced volumes of normal‐appearing white matter (NAWM) and intellectual/academic achievement deficits can be explained by patient problems with memory and attention. METHODS: Quantitative tissue volumes from magnetic resonance imaging scans and neurocognitive assessments were obtained for 40 long‐term survivors of pediatric brain tumors. They were treated with radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy 2.6–15.3 years earlier (median, 5.7 years) at an age of 1.7–14.8 years (median, 6.5 years). Neurocognitive assessments included standardized tests of intellect (intelligence quotient [IQ]), attention, memory, and academic achievement. RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant impairments in patients' neurocognitive test performance on all measures. After statistically controlling for age at RT and time from RT, significant associations were found between NAWM volumes and both attentional abilities and IQ, and between attentional abilities and IQ. Subsequent analyses supported the hypothesis that attentional abilities, but not memory, could explain a significant amount of the relationship between NAWM and IQ. The final developmental model predicting academic achievement based on NAWM, attentional abilities, and IQ explained approximately 60% of the variance in reading and spelling and almost 80% of the variance in math. CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrated that the primary consequence of reduced NAWM among pediatric patients treated for brain tumors was decreased attentional abilities, leading to declining IQ and academic achievement. Cancer 2003;10:2512–9. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11355
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Templeton, D. M., Schwenk, M., & Duffus, J. H. (2016) · IUPAC Standards Online · doi:10.1515/iupac.87.0120 · Cited by 688
Concepts of myelin and myelination in neuroradiology.
Barkovich, A. J. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 467
Neuropsychological effects of cranial radiation: current knowledge and future directions
Roman, D. D., & Sperduto, P. W. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00550-8 · Cited by 429
Palmer, S. L., Goloubeva, O., Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Gajjar, A., Kun, L., Merchant, T. E., & Mulhern, R. K. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2302 · Cited by 400
Self-citationMulhern, R. K., Kepner, J. L., Thomas, P. R., Armstrong, F. D., Friedman, H. S., & Kun, L. E. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.5.1723 · Cited by 395
Self-citationBUTLER, R. W., & COPELAND, D. R. (2002) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617701020112 · Cited by 320
Filley, C. M., & Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200108093450606 · Cited by 310
Mulhern, R. K., Palmer, S. L., Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Kun, L. E., Taylor, J., Langston, J., & Gajjar, A. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.472 · Cited by 307
Self-citationReddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Cook, E. N., Elkin, T. D., & Deaton, R. J. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.650887 · Cited by 290
Self-citationFactors Affecting Intellectual Outcome in Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients
Ellenberg, L., McComb, G. J., Siegel, S. E., & Stowe, S. (1987) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/00006123-198711000-00006 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood
Mulhern, R. K., Merchant, T. E., Gajjar, A., Reddick, W. E., & Kun, L. E. (2004) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(04)01507-4 · Cited by 872
Self-citationNeurocognitive effects of treatment for childhood cancer
Butler, R. W., & Haser, J. K. (2006) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20110 · Cited by 203
Training Attention-Switching Ability in Adults With ADHD
White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2006) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054705286063 · Cited by 83
Self-citationWhite and Gray Matter Abnormalities After Cranial Radiation in Children and Mice
Nieman, B. J., de Guzman, A. E., Gazdzinski, L. M., Lerch, J. P., Chakravarty, M. M., Pipitone, J., Strother, D., Fryer, C., Bouffet, E., Laughlin, S., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2293 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddick, W. E., White, H. A., Glass, J. O., Wheeler, G. C., Thompson, S. J., Gajjar, A., Leigh, L., & Mulhern, R. K.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-30
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2512-2519
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1981117639
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental model relating white matter volume to neurocognitive deficits in pediatric brain tumor survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11355
- The paper
- Reddick, W. E., White, H. A., Glass, J. O., Wheeler, G. C., Thompson, S. J., Gajjar, A., Leigh, L., & Mulhern, R. K. (2003). Developmental model relating white matter volume to neurocognitive deficits in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.