Cited by 743Semantic Web and OntologiesLibrary Science and Information SystemsWeb Applications and Data Management

The Semantic Web: the roles of XML and RDF

Open access
Decker, S., Melnik, S., van Harmelen, F., Fensel, D., Klein, M., Broekstra, J., Erdmann, M., Horrocks, I.·2000·IEEE Internet Computing

Abstract

XML and RDF are the current standards for establishing semantic interoperability on the Web, but XML addresses only document structure. RDF better facilitates interoperation because it provides a data model that can be extended to address sophisticated ontology representation techniques. We explain the role of ontologies in the architecture of the Semantic Web. We then briefly summarize key elements of XML and RDF, showing why using XML as a tool for semantic interoperability will be ineffective in the long run. We argue that a further representation and inference layer is needed on top of the Web's current layers, and to establish such a layer, we propose a general method for encoding ontology representation languages into RDF/RDF schema. We illustrate the extension method by applying it to Ontology Interchange Language, an ontology representation and inference language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/4236.877487

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D.L. McGuinness, et al., "The Chimaera Ontology Envi- ronment," Proc. Seventeenth Nat'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, Calif., 2000.
  2. R.J. Brachman, "On the Epistemological Status of Seman- tic Networks," in Associative Networks: Representations and Use of Knowledge by Computers, N.V. Findler, ed., Academ- ic Press, 1979, pp. 3-50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decker, S., Melnik, S., van Harmelen, F., Fensel, D., Klein, M., Broekstra, J., Erdmann, M., & Horrocks, I.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
IEEE Internet Computing
Published
2000
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
63-73
ISSN
1089-7801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159938093
Cited by
743
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 29
FWCI
49.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet Computing (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
Keywords
semantic web, XML, RDF, semantic interoperability, ontology (information science), RDF Schema, data model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review