The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perturbation analysis: the state of the art and research issues explained via the GI/G/1 queue
Abstract
Perturbation analysis (PA) of discrete event dynamic systems (DEDS) enables parameter sensitivities of DEDS to be obtained by observing a single sample path of the system. A simple GI/G/1 system is used to give an introduction to PA and illustrate the basic theoretical issues involved in this technique. The application of PA to networks of queues is covered briefly, and then some of the recent extensions to PA are discussed. It is shown that many interesting open questions remain for PA, and areas for research are indicated.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Cited by
Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis
Bankes, S. (1993) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.41.3.435 · Cited by 706
Optimization via simulation: A review
Fu, M. C. (1994) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/bf02136830 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Suri, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-137
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165292532
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perturbation analysis: the state of the art and research issues explained via the GI/G/1 queue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.21075
- The paper
- Suri, R. (1989). Perturbation analysis: the state of the art and research issues explained via the GI/G/1 queue. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.21075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
