Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iterative methods for image deblurring

Open access
Biemond, J., Lagendijk, R.L., Mersereau, R.M.·1990·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The authors discuss the use of iterative restoration algorithms for the removal of linear blurs from photographic images that may also be assumed to be degraded by pointwise nonlinearities such as film saturation and additive noise. Iterative algorithms allow for the incorporation of various types of prior knowledge about the class of feasible solutions, can be used to remove nonstationary blurs, and are fairly robust with respect to errors in the approximation of the blurring operator. Special attention is given to the problem of convergence of the algorithms, and classical solutions such as inverse filters, Wiener filters, and constrained least-squares filters are shown to be limiting solutions of variations of the iterations. Regularization is introduced as a means for preventing the excessive noise magnification that is typically associated with ill-conditioned inverse problems such as the deblurring problem, and it is shown that noise effects can be minimized by terminating the algorithms after a finite number of iterations. The role and choice of constraints on the class of feasible solutions are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/5.53403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Biemond, J., Lagendijk, R. L., & Mersereau, R. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1990-05
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
856-883
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149479098
Cited by
460
References
0
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative methods for image deblurring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.53403
The paper
Biemond, J., Lagendijk, R. L., & Mersereau, R. M. (1990). Iterative methods for image deblurring. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.53403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.