The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sampling-50 years after Shannon
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an account of the current state of sampling, 50 years after Shannon's formulation of the sampling theorem. The emphasis is on regular sampling, where the grid is uniform. This topic has benefitted from a strong research revival during the past few years, thanks in part to the mathematical connections that were made with wavelet theory. To introduce the reader to the modern, Hilbert-space formulation, we reinterpret Shannon's sampling procedure as an orthogonal projection onto the subspace of band-limited functions. We then extend the standard sampling paradigm for a presentation of functions in the more general class of "shift-in-variant" function spaces, including splines and wavelets. Practically, this allows for simpler-and possibly more realistic-interpolation models, which can be used in conjunction with a much wider class of (anti-aliasing) prefilters that are not necessarily ideal low-pass. We summarize and discuss the results available for the determination of the approximation error and of the sampling rate when the input of the system is essentially arbitrary; e.g., nonbandlimited. We also review variations of sampling that can be understood from the same unifying perspective. These include wavelets, multiwavelets, Papoulis generalized sampling, finite elements, and frames. Irregular sampling and radial basis functions are briefly mentioned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
Daubechies, I. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.57199 · Cited by 6,483
Cited by
Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs: Sampling Theory
Chen, S., Varma, R., Sandryhaila, A., & Kovacevic, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2469645 · Cited by 666
A Nyquist folding analog-to-information receiver
Fudge, G. L., Bland, R. E., Chivers, M. A., Ravindran, S., Haupt, J., & Pace, P. E. (2008) · 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers · doi:10.1109/acssc.2008.5074464 · Cited by 76
Signal Reconstruction via $H^{\infty}$ Sampled-Data Control Theory—Beyond the Shannon Paradigm
Yamamoto, Y., Nagahara, M., & Khargonekar, P. P. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2011.2175223 · Cited by 49
$H^{\infty}$-Optimal Fractional Delay Filters
Nagahara, M., & Yamamoto, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2265678 · Cited by 15
“Conventionally, fractional delay filters are designed based on the Shannon sampling theorem [13], [14] for strictly bandlimited analog signals.”
MethodSparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Unser, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-587
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2166500461
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sampling-50 years after Shannon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.843002
- The paper
- Unser, M. (2000). Sampling-50 years after Shannon. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.843002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.