The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote palpation technology
Abstract
One of a surgeon's most important tools is a highly developed sense of touch. Surgeons rely on sensations from the finger tips to guide manipulation and to perceive a wide variety of anatomical structures and pathologies. Unfortunately, new surgical techniques separate the surgeon's hands from the surgical site. These techniques include minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, and new techniques involving robotic manipulators. In these situations the surgeon's perception is limited to visual feedback from a video camera, or gross motion and force feedback through the handles of long instruments. The authors are working to develop new technology to rectify this sensory deficit by relaying tactile information from the surgical site to the surgeon. They have developed a variety of tactile sensors that can be mounted in a probe or surgical instrument. The tactile information provided by these sensors may then be conveyed through the tactile display devices the authors have developed to recreate the tactile stimulus directly on the surgeon's finger tip. By using these remote palpation devices, the surgeon may regain some of the perceptual and manipulative skills present in conventional open-incision surgery. Among the tactile feedback parameters the authors are investigating are force reflection, vibration, and small-scale shape.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand
Johansson, R. S., & Vallbo, Å. B. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90011-5 · Cited by 680
Cited by
Wearable Haptic Systems for the Fingertip and the Hand: Taxonomy, Review, and Perspectives
Pacchierotti, C., Sinclair, S., Solazzi, M., Frisoli, A., Hayward, V., & Prattichizzo, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2017.2689006 · Cited by 825
Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
Okamura, A. M. (2009) · Current Opinion in Urology · doi:10.1097/mou.0b013e32831a478c · Cited by 708
An Overview of Elastography-An Emerging Branch of Medical Imaging
Sarvazyan, A., J. Hall, T., W. Urban, M., Fatemi, M., R. Aglyamov, S., & S. Garra, B. (2011) · Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340511798038684 · Cited by 428
Biomimetic tactile sensor array
Wettels, N., Santos, V. J., Johansson, R. S., & Loeb, G. E. (2008) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1163/156855308x314533 · Cited by 348
Medical Robotics and Computer-Integrated Surgery
Taylor, R. H., Menciassi, A., Fichtinger, G., Fiorini, P., & Dario, P. (2016) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_63 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Howe, R. D., Peine, W. J., Kantarinis, D. A., & Son, J. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-323
- ISSN
- 0739-5175 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161698442
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote palpation technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/51.391770
- The paper
- Howe, R. D., Peine, W. J., Kantarinis, D. A., & Son, J. S. (1995). Remote palpation technology. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/51.391770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.