Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,812

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database

Moody, G.B., Mark, R.G.·2001·IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine

Abstract

The MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database was the first generally available set of standard test material for evaluation of arrhythmia detectors, and it has been used for that purpose as well as for basic research into cardiac dynamics at about 500 sites worldwide since 1980. It has lived a far longer life than any of its creators ever expected. Together with the American Heart Association Database, it played an interesting role in stimulating manufacturers of arrhythmia analyzers to compete on the basis of objectively measurable performance, and much of the current appreciation of the value of common databases, both for basic research and for medical device development and evaluation, can be attributed to this experience. In this article, we briefly review the history of the database, describe its contents, discuss what we have learned about database design and construction, and take a look at some of the later projects that have been stimulated by both the successes and the limitations of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/51.932724

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1126/science.134.3486.1214 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Schluter, 1981, Performance measures for arrhythmia detectors
  3. Mark, An annotated ECG database for evaluating arrhythmia detectors, 205
  4. 10.1109/CIC.1990.144205 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/51.932728 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Moody, 1984, How can we predict real-world performance of an arrhythmia detector?, 71
  7. 10.1007/978-94-009-6012-1_26 · DOI
  8. 1987, Testing and Reporting Performance Results of Ventricular Arrhythmia Detection Algorithms [AAMI ECAR]. Assoc. for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
  9. 1998, American National Standard for Ambulatory Electrocardiographs. AAMI/ANSI Standard EC38:1998
  10. 1998, American National Standard for Testing and Reporting Performance Results of Cardiac Rhythm and ST Segment Measurement Algorithms. AAMI/ANSI Standard EC57:1998
  11. Moody, 1993, Standards and applicable databases for long-term ECG monitoring, J. Electrocardiology, 26, 151
  12. Hermes, 1981, Development, distribution, and use of the American Heart Association database for ventricular arrhythmia detector evaluation, 263
  13. 10.1109/CIC.1990.144191 · doi:10.1109/cic.1990.144191
  14. 10.1109/CIC.1998.731793 · doi:10.1109/cic.1998.731793

Cited by

See all 4,812

Metadata

Authors
Moody, G. B., & Mark, R. G.
Venue
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
Published
2001
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
45-50
ISSN
0739-5175 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095409369
Cited by
4,812
References
0
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/51.932724
The paper
Moody, G. B., & Mark, R. G. (2001). The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/51.932724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.