Cited by 1,162Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentMachine Learning in Healthcare

Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II: A public-access intensive care unit database*

Open access
Saeed, Mohammed, Villarroel, Mauricio, Reisner, Andrew T., Clifford, Gari, Lehman, Li-Wei, Moody, George, Heldt, Thomas, Kyaw, Tin H. +2 more·2011·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an intensive care unit research database applying automated techniques to aggregate high-resolution diagnostic and therapeutic data from a large, diverse population of adult intensive care unit patients. This freely available database is intended to support epidemiologic research in critical care medicine and serve as a resource to evaluate new clinical decision support and monitoring algorithms. DESIGN: Data collection and retrospective analysis. SETTING: All adult intensive care units (medical intensive care unit, surgical intensive care unit, cardiac care unit, cardiac surgery recovery unit) at a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to intensive care units between 2001 and 2007. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II (MIMIC-II) database consists of 25,328 intensive care unit stays. The investigators collected detailed information about intensive care unit patient stays, including laboratory data, therapeutic intervention profiles such as vasoactive medication drip rates and ventilator settings, nursing progress notes, discharge summaries, radiology reports, provider order entry data, International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes, and, for a subset of patients, high-resolution vital sign trends and waveforms. Data were automatically deidentified to comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act standards and integrated with relational database software to create electronic intensive care unit records for each patient stay. The data were made freely available in February 2010 through the Internet along with a detailed user's guide and an assortment of data processing tools. The overall hospital mortality rate was 11.7%, which varied by critical care unit. The median intensive care unit length of stay was 2.2 days (interquartile range, 1.1-4.4 days). According to the primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes, the following disease categories each comprised at least 5% of the case records: diseases of the circulatory system (39.1%); trauma (10.2%); diseases of the digestive system (9.7%); pulmonary diseases (9.0%); infectious diseases (7.0%); and neoplasms (6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: MIMIC-II documents a diverse and very large population of intensive care unit patient stays and contains comprehensive and detailed clinical data, including physiological waveforms and minute-by-minute trends for a subset of records. It establishes a new public-access resource for critical care research, supporting a diverse range of analytic studies spanning epidemiology, clinical decision-rule development, and electronic tool development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31820a92c6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MIMIC-II followed with a significantly increased sample size and breadth of information due to the clinical information being entirely sourced from various digital information systems.

    “MIMIC-II followed with a significantly increased sample size and breadth of information due to the clinical information being entirely sourced from various digital information systems2.”

    From MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    Materials and Methods (Database Development and Clinical Data; page unavailable) says MIMIC-II aggregated clinical data from ICU information systems and hospital electronic archives, while the Conclusions describe a large, detailed database. The cited paper does not establish the claimed increase in sample size and information breadth relative to its predecessor or attribute that increase to the use of digital systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saeed, M., Villarroel, M., Reisner, A. T., Clifford, G., Lehman, L.-W., Moody, G., Heldt, T., Kyaw, T. H., Moody, B., & Mark, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
952-960
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046788142
Cited by
1,162
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 31
FWCI
54.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB001659, R01-EB017205)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
MIMIC-II, critical care research, electronic health records, physiological waveforms, clinical decision support, in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, de-identification, ventilator settings, vasoactive drugs
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Critical Care, Expert Systems, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Medical Informatics Applications, Monitoring, Physiologic, Quality Control, Retrospective Studies, United States, Databases, Factual, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review