The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits
Abstract
Research in the information processing, situated learning and social network traditions has consistently demonstrated the importance of social networks for acquiring information. However, we know little about how organizational relationships established by a relative position in a formal structure or social relationships established by interpersonal processes influence who is sought out for various kinds of information. Prior research suggests that people often receive some combination of five benefits when seeking information from other people: (1) solutions; (2) meta-knowledge (pointers to databases or people); (3) problem reformulation; (4) validation of plans or solutions; and (5) legitimation from contact with a respected person. This research builds on that work by assessing the influence of organizational and social structures (such as similarity of job function, hierarchy, task interdependence, physical proximity, influence, trust, friendship and gender) on receipt of these benefits from other people in a physically distributed organization. Task interdependence is the strongest and most consistent predictor of information seeking. However, social relations also affect the receipt of informational benefits, especially as they become more representational and affective. Implications are suggested for the study of social capital, computer-mediated communication and organizational learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 2×
“Social network research has typically emphasized the role of weak or bridging ties in the acquisition of nonredundant information [18], [44], [84], [88], [89], (for an exception, see [ 45 ]).”
BackgroundMind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes
VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1980) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 · Cited by 3,123
Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization
Brass, D. J. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392937 · Cited by 1,549
Actualizing organizational memory with information systems
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.85 · Cited by 843
Socially Shared Cognition at Work: Transactive Memory and Group Performance
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996) · What's Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups · doi:10.4135/9781483327648.n3 · Cited by 456 · cited 1×
“tently demonstrated the importance of social relationships for acquiring information [3], [16], [32], [69], learning how to do one’s work [15], [60], [75], [97], and collectively solving cognitively complex tasks [48], [70], [105].”
Background
Cited by
A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks
Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 · Cited by 2,085
Self-citationBorrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 438-448
- ISSN
- 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067708143
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5326.983927
- The paper
- Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001). Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.983927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.