Cited by 843Organizational Learning and LeadershipKnowledge Management and SharingKnowledge Management and Technology

Actualizing organizational memory with information systems

Stein, Eric W., Zwass, Vladimir·1995·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Preservation of organizational memory becomes increasingly important to organizations as it is recognized that experiential knowledge is a key to competitiveness. With the development and widespread availability of advanced information technologies (IT), information systems become a vital part of this memory. We analyze existing conceptualizations and task-specific instances of IT-supported organizational memory. We then develop a model for an organizational memory information system (OMIS) that is rooted in the construct of organizational effectiveness. The framework offers four subsystems that support activities leading to organizational effectiveness. These subsystems rest on the foundation of five mnemonic functions that provide for acquisition, retention, maintenance, search, and retrieval of information. We then identify the factors that will limit the success of OMIS implementation, although full treatment of this issue is outside the scope of the paper. To initiate a research agenda on OMIS, we propose an initial contingency framework for OMIS development depending on the organization's environment and its life-cycle stage, and discuss the relationships between an OMIS and organizational learning and decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.6.2.85

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizational memory processes include acquisition, preservation, maintenance, and recovery.

    “Organizational memory processes include the acquisition, preservation, maintenance and recovery (Stein & Zwass, 1995).”

    From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Stein & Zwass, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
1995-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
85-117
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2119614939
Cited by
843
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 43
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
Keywords
institutional memory, experiential knowledge, organizational effectiveness, memory function, knowledge retention, organizational learning, decision-making, contingency framework, organizational life cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review