Actualizing organizational memory with information systems
Abstract
Preservation of organizational memory becomes increasingly important to organizations as it is recognized that experiential knowledge is a key to competitiveness. With the development and widespread availability of advanced information technologies (IT), information systems become a vital part of this memory. We analyze existing conceptualizations and task-specific instances of IT-supported organizational memory. We then develop a model for an organizational memory information system (OMIS) that is rooted in the construct of organizational effectiveness. The framework offers four subsystems that support activities leading to organizational effectiveness. These subsystems rest on the foundation of five mnemonic functions that provide for acquisition, retention, maintenance, search, and retrieval of information. We then identify the factors that will limit the success of OMIS implementation, although full treatment of this issue is outside the scope of the paper. To initiate a research agenda on OMIS, we propose an initial contingency framework for OMIS development depending on the organization's environment and its life-cycle stage, and discuss the relationships between an OMIS and organizational learning and decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizational memory processes include acquisition, preservation, maintenance, and recovery.
“Organizational memory processes include the acquisition, preservation, maintenance and recovery (Stein & Zwass, 1995).”
From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Stein & Zwass, 1995
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Rose, G. M. (2000) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00017-x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory
Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Human-centered design of a distributed knowledge management system
Rinkus, S., Walji, M., Johnson-Throop, K. A., Malin, J. T., Turley, J. P., Smith, J. W., & Zhang, J. (2005) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.014 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Knowledge management capability and organizational memory: a study of public sector agencies
Adobor, H., Kudonoo, E., & Daneshfar, A. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-10-2018-0225 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
M. Vogl, T. (2020) · The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3396956.3396971 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-117
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2119614939
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 27.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
- Keywords
- institutional memory, experiential knowledge, organizational effectiveness, memory function, knowledge retention, organizational learning, decision-making, contingency framework, organizational life cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review