The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals
Abstract
Delay estimation is used in ultrasonic imaging to estimate blood or soft tissue motion, to measure echo arrival time differences for phase aberration correction, and to estimate displacement for tissue elasticity measurements. In each of these applications delay estimation is performed using speckle signals which are at least partially decorrelated relative to one another. Delay estimates which utilize such data are subject to large errors known as false peaks and smaller magnitude errors known as jitter. While false peaks can sometimes be removed through nonlinear processing, jitter errors place a fundamental limit on the performance of delay estimation techniques. The authors apply the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound to derive an analytical expression which predicts the magnitude of jitter errors incurred when estimating delays using radio frequency (RF) data from speckle targets. The analytical expression presented includes the effects of signal decorrelation due to physical processes, corruption by electronic noise, and a number of other factors. Simulation results are presented which show that the performance of the normalized cross correlation algorithm closely matches theoretical predictions. These results indicate that for poor signal to noise ratios (0 dB) a small improvement in signal to noise ratio can dramatically reduce jitter magnitude. At high signal to noise ratios (30 dB) small amounts of signal decorrelation can significantly increase the magnitude of jitter errors.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay
Knapp, C., & Carter, G. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1976.1162830 · Cited by 4,433 · cited 2×
“Carter and Knapp derived a generalized expression for the jitter magnitude when stochastic signals (such as speckle) are used in high signal to noise ratio environments [16].”
BackgroundResult
Cited by
A fast normalized cross-correlation calculation method for motion estimation
Luo, J., & Konofagou, E. E. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2010.1554 · Cited by 384
Review of Photoacoustic Flow Imaging: Its Current State and Its Promises
van den Berg, P. J., Daoudi, K., & Steenbergen, W. (2015) · Photoacoustics · doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2015.08.001 · Cited by 84
A Survey of Time Delay Estimation Performance Bounds
Sadler, B. M., & Kozick, R. J. (2006) · Fourth IEEE Workshop on Sensor Array and Multichannel Processing, 2006. · doi:10.1109/sam.2006.1706138 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, W. F., & Trahey, G. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-308
- ISSN
- 0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102248332
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/58.365243
- The paper
- Walker, W. F., & Trahey, G. E. (1995). A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.365243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.