The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging
Abstract
For ultrasound color flow images with high quality, it is important to suppress the clutter signals originating from stationary and slowly moving tissue sufficiently. Without sufficient clutter rejection, low velocity blood flow cannot be measured, and estimates of higher velocities will have a large bias. The small number of samples available (8 to 16) makes clutter filtering in color flow imaging a challenging problem. In this paper, we review and analyze three classes of filters: finite impulse response (FIR), infinite impulse response (IIR), and regression filters. The quality of the filters was assessed based on the frequency response, as well as on the bias and variance of a mean blood velocity estimator using an autocorrelation technique. For FIR filters, the frequency response was improved by allowing a non-linear phase response. By estimating the mean blood flow velocity from two vectors filtered in the forward and backward direction, respectively, the standard deviation was significantly lower with a minimum phase filter than with a linear phase filter. For IIR filters applied to short signals, the transient part of the output signal is important. We analyzed zero, step, and projection initialization, and found that projection initialization gave the best filters. For regression filters, polynomial basis functions provide effective clutter suppression. The best filters from each of the three classes gave comparable bias and variance of the mean blood velocity estimates. However, polynomial regression filters and projection-initialized IIR filters had a slightly better frequency response than could be obtained with FIR filters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Demene, C., Deffieux, T., Pernot, M., Osmanski, B.-F., Biran, V., Gennisson, J.-L., Sieu, L.-A., Bergel, A., Franqui, S., Correas, J.-M., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2428634 · Cited by 983
Short-lag spatial coherence of backscattered echoes: imaging characteristics
Lediju, M. A., Trahey, G. E., Byram, B. C., & Dahl, J. J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2011.1957 · Cited by 445
Baranger, J., Arnal, B., Perren, F., Baud, O., Tanter, M., & Demene, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2789499 · Cited by 348
Deep learning in ultrasound imaging
van Sloun, R. J. G., Cohen, R., & Eldar, Y. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2932116 · Cited by 316
Ultrasound Small Vessel Imaging With Block-Wise Adaptive Local Clutter Filtering
Song, P., Manduca, A., Trzasko, J. D., & Chen, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2605819 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjaerum, S., Torp, H., & Kristoffersen, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-216
- ISSN
- 0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081021250
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/58.985705
- The paper
- Bjaerum, S., Torp, H., & Kristoffersen, K. (2002). Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.985705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.