The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power quality disturbance waveform recognition using wavelet-based neural classifier. I. Theoretical foundation
Abstract
Existing techniques for recognizing and identifying power quality disturbance waveforms are primarily based on visual inspection of the waveform. It is the purpose of this paper to bring to bear advances, especially in wavelet transforms, artificial neural networks, and the mathematical theory of evidence, to the problem of automatic power quality disturbance waveform recognition. Unlike past attempts to automatically identify disturbance waveforms where the identification is performed in the time domain using an individual artificial neural network, the proposed recognition scheme is carried out in the wavelet domain using a set of multiple neural networks. The outcomes of the networks are then integrated using decision making schemes such as a simple voting scheme or the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. With such a configuration, the classifier is capable of providing a degree of belief for the identified disturbance waveform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Cited by
Neural-Network-Based Signature Recognition for Harmonic Source Identification
Srinivasan, D., Ng, W. S., & Liew, A. C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2005.852370 · Cited by 453
Methodologies in power systems fault detection and diagnosis
Aleem, S. A., Shahid, N., & Naqvi, I. H. (2015) · Energy Systems · doi:10.1007/s12667-014-0129-1 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Santoso, S., Powers, E. J., Grady, W. M., & Parsons, A. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 222-228
- ISSN
- 0885-8977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131456415
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.