Cited by 453Power Quality and HarmonicsSmart Grid Energy ManagementAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

Neural-Network-Based Signature Recognition for Harmonic Source Identification

Srinivasan, D., Ng, W.S., Liew, A.C.·2006·IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

Abstract

This paper proposes a neural-network (NN)-based approach to nonintrusive harmonic source identification. In this approach, NNs are trained to extract important features from the input current waveform to uniquely identify various types of devices using their distinct harmonic "signatures". Such automated, noninvasive device identification will be critical in future power-quality monitoring and enhancement systems. Several NN-based classification models including multilayer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF) network, and support vector machines (SVM) with linear, polynomial, and RBF kernels were developed for signature extraction and device identification. These models were trained and tested using spike train data gathered from the Fourier analysis of the input current waveform in the presence of multiple devices. The performance of these models was compared in terms of their accuracy, generalization ability, and noise tolerance limits. The results showed that MLPs and SVM were both able to determine the presence of devices based on their harmonic signatures with high accuracy. MLP was found to be the best signature identification method because of its low computational requirements and ability to extract the information necessary for highly accurate device identification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpwrd.2005.852370

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promising ML approaches to energy disaggregation include hidden Markov models, sparse coding, harmonic analysis, and deep neural networks.

    “Promising ML approaches to this problem include hidden Markov models [445], sparse coding algorithms for structured prediction [443], harmonic analysis that picks out the "signatures" of individual appliances [750], and deep neural networks [423].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [750]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srinivasan, D., Ng, W. S., & Liew, A. C.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Published
2006-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
398-405
ISSN
0885-8977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131634249
Cited by
453
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
harmonic source identification, non-intrusive load monitoring, device identification, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, radial basis function neural network, power quality monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review