Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal choice for number of strands in a litz-wire transformer winding

Sullivan, C.R.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

The number and diameter of strands to minimize loss in a litz-wire transformer winding is determined. With fine stranding, the AC resistance factor can be decreased, but DC resistance increases as a result of the space occupied by insulation. A power law to model insulation thickness is combined with standard analysis of proximity-effect losses to find the optimal stranding. Suboptimal choices under other constraints are also determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/63.750181

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Sullivan, C. R.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
1999-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
283-291
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2169536906
Cited by
558
References
0
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal choice for number of strands in a litz-wire transformer winding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/63.750181
The paper
Sullivan, C. R. (1999). Optimal choice for number of strands in a litz-wire transformer winding. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.750181

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.