The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation
Abstract
ALLIANCE is a software architecture that facilitates the fault tolerant cooperative control of teams of heterogeneous mobile robots performing missions composed of loosely coupled subtasks that may have ordering dependencies. ALLIANCE allows teams of robots, each of which possesses a variety of high-level functions that it can perform during a mission, to individually select appropriate actions throughout the mission based on the requirements of the mission, the activities of other robots, the current environmental conditions, and the robot's own internal states. ALLIANCE is a fully distributed, behaviour-based architecture that incorporates the use of mathematically-modeled motivations (such as impatience and acquiescence) within each robot to achieve adaptive action selection. Since cooperative robotic teams usually work in dynamic and unpredictable environments, this software architecture allows the robot team members to respond robustly, reliably, flexibly, and coherently to unexpected environmental changes and modifications in the robot team that may occur due to mechanical failure, the learning of new skills, or the addition or removal of robots from the team by human intervention. The feasibility of this architecture is demonstrated in an implementation on a team of mobile robots performing a laboratory version of hazardous waste cleanup.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A robust layered control system for a mobile robot
Brooks, R. (1986) · IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/jra.1986.1087032 · Cited by 7,799 · cited 1×
“These functions map very closely to the upper layers of the subsumption-based control architecture [6].”
BackgroundConway, R. W., Maxwell, W., & Miller, L. W. (1967) · Cited by 2,167
Brooks, R. A. (1990) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(05)80025-9 · Cited by 1,354
Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving
Davis, R., & Smith, R. G. (1983) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(83)90015-2 · Cited by 1,230
Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence
(1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07700-6 · Cited by 986
Brooks, R. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5025.1227 · Cited by 752
Frameworks for Cooperation in Distributed Problem Solving
Smith, R. G., & Davis, R. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1981.4308579 · Cited by 649
Communication in reactive multiagent robotic systems
Balch, T., & Arkin, R. C. (1994) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/bf00735341 · Cited by 512
Cooperative mobile robotics: antecedents and directions
Cao, Y. U., Fukunaga, A. S., Kahng, A. B., & Meng, F. (2002) · Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots · doi:10.1109/iros.1995.525801 · Cited by 444
Designing Emergent Behaviors: From Local Interactions to Collective Intelligence
Mataric, M. J. (1993) · From Animals to Animats 2 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3116.003.0059 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Current State of the Art in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robotics
Parker, L. E. (2000) · Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 4 · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-67919-6_1 · Cited by 276
Self-citationIjspeert, A. J., Martinoli, A., Billard, A., & Gambardella, L. M. (2001) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1011227210047 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, L. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 220-240
- ISSN
- 1042-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137714578
- Cited by
- 1,312
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/70.681242
- The paper
- Parker, L. E. (1998). ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.681242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.