Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Confidence interval prediction for neural network models

Chryssolouris, G., Lee, M., Ramsey, A.·1996·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

Abstract

To derive an estimate of a neural network's accuracy as an empirical modeling tool, a method to quantify the confidence intervals of a neural network model of a physical system is desired. In general, a model of a physical system has error associated with its predictions due to the dependence of the physical system's output on uncontrollable or unobservable quantities. A confidence interval can be computed for a neural network model with the assumption of normally distributed error for the neural network. The proposed method accounts for the accuracy of the data with which the neural network model is trained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/72.478409

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Chryssolouris, G., Lee, M., & Ramsey, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
Published
1996
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
229-232
ISSN
1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107376597
Cited by
229
References
0
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidence interval prediction for neural network models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/72.478409
The paper
Chryssolouris, G., Lee, M., & Ramsey, A. (1996). Confidence interval prediction for neural network models. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.478409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.