Tomographic time-frequency analysis and its application toward time-varying filtering and adaptive kernel design for multicomponent linear-FM signals
Abstract
Since line integrals through the Wigner spectrum can be calculated by dechirping, calculation of the Wigner spectrum may be viewed as a tomographic reconstruction problem. In the paper, the authors show that all time-frequency transforms of Cohen's class may be achieved by simple changes in backprojection reconstruction filtering. The resolution/cross-term tradeoff that occurs in time-frequency kernel selection is shown to be analogous to the resolution-ringing tradeoff that occurs in computed tomography (CT). "Ideal" reconstruction using a purely differentiating backprojection filter yields the Wigner distribution, whereas low-pass differentiating filters produce cross-term suppressing distributions such as the spectrogram or the Born-Jordan distribution. It is also demonstrated how this analogy can be exploited to "tune" the reconstruction filtering (or time-frequency kernel) to improve the ringing/resolution tradeoff. Some properties of the projection domain, which is also known as the Radon-Wigner transform, are characterized, including the response to signal delays or frequency shifts and projection masking or convolution. Last, time-varying filtering by shift-varying convolution in the Radon-Wigner domain is shown to yield superior results to its analogous Cohen's class adaptive transform (shift-invariant convolution) for the multicomponent, linear-FM signals that are investigated.>
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital computation of the fractional Fourier transform
Ozaktas, H. M., Arikan, O., Kutay, M. A., & Bozdagt, G. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.536672 · Cited by 1,187 · see citing works
Short-time fourier transform: two fundamental properties and an optimal implementation
Durak, L., & Arikan, O. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.810293 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
introduction to the fractional fourier transform and its applications
Ozaktas, H. M., Kutay, M. A., & Mendlovic, D. (1999) · Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics · doi:10.1016/s1076-5670(08)70272-6 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wood, J. C., & Barry, D. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2094-2104
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100175948
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
- Keywords
- Wigner function, Radon-Wigner transform, time-varying filters, dechirping, cross-term suppression, spectrogram
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review