Cited by 80Mathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesRadar Systems and Signal Processing

Tomographic time-frequency analysis and its application toward time-varying filtering and adaptive kernel design for multicomponent linear-FM signals

Wood, J.C., Barry, D.T.·1994·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

Since line integrals through the Wigner spectrum can be calculated by dechirping, calculation of the Wigner spectrum may be viewed as a tomographic reconstruction problem. In the paper, the authors show that all time-frequency transforms of Cohen's class may be achieved by simple changes in backprojection reconstruction filtering. The resolution/cross-term tradeoff that occurs in time-frequency kernel selection is shown to be analogous to the resolution-ringing tradeoff that occurs in computed tomography (CT). "Ideal" reconstruction using a purely differentiating backprojection filter yields the Wigner distribution, whereas low-pass differentiating filters produce cross-term suppressing distributions such as the spectrogram or the Born-Jordan distribution. It is also demonstrated how this analogy can be exploited to "tune" the reconstruction filtering (or time-frequency kernel) to improve the ringing/resolution tradeoff. Some properties of the projection domain, which is also known as the Radon-Wigner transform, are characterized, including the response to signal delays or frequency shifts and projection masking or convolution. Last, time-varying filtering by shift-varying convolution in the Radon-Wigner domain is shown to yield superior results to its analogous Cohen's class adaptive transform (shift-invariant convolution) for the multicomponent, linear-FM signals that are investigated.>

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/78.301844

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, J. C., & Barry, D. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
1994
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
2094-2104
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100175948
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
Keywords
Wigner function, Radon-Wigner transform, time-varying filters, dechirping, cross-term suppression, spectrogram

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review