Cited by 777Control Systems and IdentificationAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesBlind Source Separation Techniques

A least-squares approach to blind channel identification

Guanghan Xu, Hui Liu, Lang Tong, Kailath, T.·1995·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

Conventional blind channel identification algorithms are based on channel outputs and knowledge of the probabilistic model of channel input. In some practical applications, however, the input statistical model may not be known, or there may not be sufficient data to obtain accurate enough estimates of certain statistics. In this paper, we consider the system input to be an unknown deterministic signal and study the problem of blind identification of multichannel FIR systems without requiring the knowledge of the input statistical model. A new blind identification algorithm based solely on the system outputs is proposed. Necessary and sufficient identifiability conditions in terms of the multichannel systems and the deterministic input signal are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/78.476442

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two channel impulse responses h0 and h1 can be uniquely determined (up to a scale and a common delay) from the covariance relation if the polynomials formed from h0 and h1 are coprime and the autocorrelation matrix of the source signal is of full rank.

    “It has been shown that the two channel impulse responses (i.e., h 0 and h 1) can be uniquely determined (up to a scale and a common delay) from (32) if the following two conditions hold [56-58]:”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, G., Liu, H., Tong, L., & Kailath, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
1995
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
2982-2993
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046791564
Cited by
777
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 32
FWCI
44.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Blind Source Separation Techniques
Keywords
blind channel estimation, least squares identification, identifiability conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review