Cited by 179Electromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsAntenna Design and Analysis

Analytical antenna model for chiral scatterers: comparison with numerical and experimental data

Tretyakov, S.A., Mariotte, F., Simovski, C.R., Kharina, T.G., Heliot, J.-P.·1996·IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Abstract

An analytical model for polarizability dyadics of small chiral conductive particles in free space or those embedded in a lossy material is presented and discussed. Chiral particles are modeled by a wire loop connected to two straight wire elements. The electromagnetic analysis is based on the replacement of the particles by two connected antennas representing the wire and loop portions. Analytical expressions for polarizabilities are given. For electrically small particles, a lumped-element equivalent circuit can be constructed and the polarizabilities can be expressed in terms of equivalent circuit parameters. It is shown that the wire-and-loop antenna model for scatterers satisfies the reciprocity condition and other basic physical requirements. Approximate analytical expressions are compared with numerical simulations and with the experimental data on reflection from single chiral particles, and the results are seen to be in good agreement. The model can be used in analytical modeling of chiral and omega composite materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/8.504309

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electromagnetic wave propagation in the proposed system reflects a quantized photonic spin Hall effect exactly analogous to the quantum spin Hall effect in electronic systems.

    “Electromagnetic wave propagation therefore reflects a quantized photonic spin Hall effect that is exactly analogous to the quantum spin Hall effect in electronic systems [ 2, 41].”

    From Photonic topological insulators (2013) · cites this paper as [41]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tretyakov, S. A., Mariotte, F., Simovski, C. R., Kharina, T. G., & Heliot, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • St. Petersburg State Technological Institute (RU)
  • CEA CESTA (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Published
1996-07
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1006-1014
ISSN
0018-926X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116724477
Cited by
179
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Antenna Design and Analysis
Keywords
lumped equivalent circuit, reciprocity condition, electromagnetic scattering, lossy media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review