The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address events
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses connectivity between neuromorphic chips, which use the timing of fixed-height fixed-width pulses to encode information. Address-events (log/sub 2/(N)-bit packets that uniquely identify one of N neurons) are used to transmit these pulses in real time on a random-access time-multiplexed communication channel. Activity is assumed to consist of neuronal ensembles-spikes clustered in space and in time. This paper quantifies tradeoffs faced in allocating bandwidth, granting access, and queuing, as well as throughput requirements, and concludes that an arbitered channel design is the best choice. The arbitered channel is implemented with a formal design methodology for asynchronous digital VLSI CMOS systems, after introducing the reader to this top-down synthesis technique. Following the evolution of three generations of designs, it is shown how the overhead of arbitrating, and encoding and decoding, can be reduced in area (from N to /spl radic/N) by organizing neurons into rows and columns, and reduced in time (from log/sub 2/(N) to 2) by exploiting locality in the arbiter tree and in the row-column architecture, and clustered activity. Throughput is boosted by pipelining and by reading spikes in parallel. Simple techniques that reduce crosstalk in these mixed analog-digital systems are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuromorphic electronic systems
Mead, C. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58356 · Cited by 2,368
Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina
Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., & Dubs, A. (1982) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1982.0085 · Cited by 1,042
Cited by
A 128$\times$128 120 dB 15 $\mu$s Latency Asynchronous Temporal Contrast Vision Sensor
Lichtsteiner, P., Posch, C., & Delbruck, T. (2008) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2007.914337 · Cited by 2,485
Qiao, N., Mostafa, H., Corradi, F., Osswald, M., Stefanini, F., Sumislawska, D., & Indiveri, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00141 · Cited by 698
Advancing Neuromorphic Computing With Loihi: A Survey of Results and Outlook
Davies, M., Wild, A., Orchard, G., Sandamirskaya, Y., Guerra, G. A. F., Joshi, P., Plank, P., & Risbud, S. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3067593 · Cited by 688
Moradi, S., Qiao, N., Stefanini, F., & Indiveri, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2017.2759700 · Cited by 650
CIFAR10-DVS: An Event-Stream Dataset for Object Classification
Li, H., Liu, H., Ji, X., Li, G., & Shi, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00309 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Boahen, K. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 416-434
- ISSN
- 1057-7130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163288878
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/82.842110
- The paper
- Boahen, K. A. (2000). Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address events. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/82.842110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.