The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression
Open accessAbstract
The first part of this paper proposes an adaptive, data-driven threshold for image denoising via wavelet soft-thresholding. The threshold is derived in a Bayesian framework, and the prior used on the wavelet coefficients is the generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD) widely used in image processing applications. The proposed threshold is simple and closed-form, and it is adaptive to each subband because it depends on data-driven estimates of the parameters. Experimental results show that the proposed method, called BayesShrink, is typically within 5% of the MSE of the best soft-thresholding benchmark with the image assumed known. It also outperforms SureShrink (Donoho and Johnstone 1994, 1995; Donoho 1995) most of the time. The second part of the paper attempts to further validate claims that lossy compression can be used for denoising. The BayesShrink threshold can aid in the parameter selection of a coder designed with the intention of denoising, and thus achieving simultaneous denoising and compression. Specifically, the zero-zone in the quantization step of compression is analogous to the threshold value in the thresholding function. The remaining coder design parameters are chosen based on a criterion derived from Rissanen's minimum description length (MDL) principle. Experiments show that this compression method does indeed remove noise significantly, especially for large noise power. However, it introduces quantization noise and should be used only if bitrate were an additional concern to denoising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Cited by
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
“2713099 problems in imaging including denoising [1]–[3], deconvolution [4], [5], and interpolation [6].”
BackgroundSpatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising
Chang, S. G., Yu, B., & Vetterli, M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.862630 · Cited by 893
Self-citationA New SURE Approach to Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding
Luisier, F., Blu, T., & Unser, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.891064 · Cited by 623
Bivariate shrinkage with local variance estimation
Sendur, L., & Selesnick, I. W. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2002.806054 · Cited by 579
Privacy and Security Issues in Deep Learning: A Survey
Liu, X., Xie, L., Wang, Y., Zou, J., Xiong, J., Ying, Z., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3045078 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, S. G., Yu, B., & Vetterli, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1532-1546
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125527601
- Cited by
- 2,936
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.862633
- The paper
- Chang, S. G., Yu, B., & Vetterli, M. (2000). Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.862633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.