The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images
Abstract
Many electronic watermarks for still images and video content are sensitive to geometric distortions. For example, simple rotation, scaling, and/or translation (RST) of an image can prevent blind detection of a public watermark. In this paper, we propose a watermarking algorithm that is robust to RST distortions. The watermark is embedded into a one-dimensional (1-D) signal obtained by taking the Fourier transform of the image, resampling the Fourier magnitudes into log-polar coordinates, and then summing a function of those magnitudes along the log-radius axis. Rotation of the image results in a cyclical shift of the extracted signal. Scaling of the image results in amplification of the extracted signal, and translation of the image has no effect on the extracted signal. We can therefore compensate for rotation with a simple search, and compensate for scaling by using the correlation coefficient as the detection measure. False positive results on a database of 10,000 images are reported. Robustness results on a database of 2000 images are described. It is shown that the watermark is robust to rotation, scale, and translation. In addition, we describe tests examining the watermarks resistance to cropping and JPEG compression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650120 · Cited by 5,299
Self-citation
Cited by
An Evaluation of Popular Copy-Move Forgery Detection Approaches
Christlein, V., Riess, C., Jordan, J., Riess, C., & Angelopoulou, E. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2218597 · Cited by 802
Robust and secure image hashing
Swaminathan, A., Mao, Y., & Wu, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2006.873601 · Cited by 552
Self-citationEfficient Dense-Field Copy–Move Forgery Detection
Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2455334 · Cited by 451
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Self-citationDigital Image Watermarking Techniques: A Review
Begum, M., & Uddin, M. S. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11020110 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C.-Y., Wu, M., Bloom, J. A., Cox, I. J., Miller, M. L., & Lui, Y. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 767-782
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096142234
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.918569
- The paper
- Lin, C.-Y., Wu, M., Bloom, J. A., Cox, I. J., Miller, M. L., & Lui, Y. M. (2001). Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.918569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.