Cited by 5,300Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesDigital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Data Compression Techniques

Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia

Cox, I.J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F.T., Shamoon, T.·1997·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

This paper presents a secure (tamper-resistant) algorithm for watermarking images, and a methodology for digital watermarking that may be generalized to audio, video, and multimedia data. We advocate that a watermark should be constructed as an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian random vector that is imperceptibly inserted in a spread-spectrum-like fashion into the perceptually most significant spectral components of the data. We argue that insertion of a watermark under this regime makes the watermark robust to signal processing operations (such as lossy compression, filtering, digital-analog and analog-digital conversion, requantization, etc.), and common geometric transformations (such as cropping, scaling, translation, and rotation) provided that the original image is available and that it can be successfully registered against the transformed watermarked image. In these cases, the watermark detector unambiguously identifies the owner. Further, the use of Gaussian noise, ensures strong resilience to multiple-document, or collusional, attacks. Experimental results are provided to support these claims, along with an exposition of pending open problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/83.650120

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

34 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. kilian, 0, Resistance of watermarked documents to collusional attacks
  2. braudaway, 1996, Color correct digital watermarking of images
  3. adelson, 1990, Digital signal encoding and decoding apparatus
  4. schreiber, 1991, Receiver-compatible enhanced definition television system
  5. rhoads, 1995, Indentification/authentication coding method and apparatus
  6. turner, 1989, Digital data security system

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T.
Affiliations
  • NEC (Japan) (JP)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
1997-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
1673-1687
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2116467012
Cited by
5,299
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 168 · 2015: 201 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 240 · 2012: 289
FWCI
98.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Keywords
digital watermarking, spread spectrum watermarking, tamper resistance, Gaussian random vectors, image watermarking, watermark robustness, lossy compression, geometric transformations, image registration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review