The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOMS: maximal-order interpolation of minimal support
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of interpolating a signal using a linear combination of shifted versions of a compactly-supported basis function phi(x). We first give the expression for the cases of phi's that have minimal support for a given accuracy (also known as "approximation order"). This class of functions, which we call maximal-order-minimal-support functions (MOMS) is made of linear combinations of the B-spline of the same order and of its derivatives. We provide an explicit form of the MOMS that maximizes the approximation accuracy when the step-size is small enough. We compute the sampling gain obtained by using these optimal basis functions over the splines of the same order. We show that it is already substantial for small orders and that it further increases with the approximation order L. When L is large, this sampling gain becomes linear; more specifically, its exact asymptotic expression is 2/(pie)L. Since the optimal functions are continuous, but not differentiable, for even orders, and even only piecewise continuous for odd orders, our result implies that regularity has little to do with approximating performance. These theoretical findings are corroborated by experimental evidence that involves compounded rotations of images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform
Harris, F. J. (1978) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1978.10837 · Cited by 7,326
Cited by
Sampling-50 years after Shannon
Unser, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.843002 · Cited by 1,358
Self-citationSparse geometric image representations with bandelets
Le Pennec, E., & Mallat, S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.843753 · Cited by 860
Yu, G., Sapiro, G., & Mallat, S. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2176743 · Cited by 561
Sampling Moments and Reconstructing Signals of Finite Rate of Innovation: Shannon Meets Strang–Fix
Dragotti, P. L., Vetterli, M., & Blu, T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2006.890907 · Cited by 428
Self-citationZaitsev, M., Hennig, J., & Speck, O. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20261 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Blu, T., Thcvenaz, P., & Unser, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1069-1080
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153608957
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOMS: maximal-order interpolation of minimal support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.931101
- The paper
- Blu, T., Thcvenaz, P., & Unser, M. (2001). MOMS: maximal-order interpolation of minimal support. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.931101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.