Cited by 155Spinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Implanted functional electrical stimulation system for mobility in paraplegia: a follow-up case report

Kobetic, R., Sharma, M., Triolo, R.J., Uhlir, J.P., Bieri, C., Wibowo, M., Polando, G., Marsolais, E.B. +2 more·1999·IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

A 16-channel functional electrical stimulation (FES) system has been implanted in a person with T10 paraplegia for over a year. The system consists of two eight-channel radio frequency controlled receiver-stimulators delivering stimuli through a network of 14 epimysial and two intramuscular electrodes. Using this system and a walker for support, the subject was able to stand up for 8 min and walk regularly for 20 m. The standing duration was limited by arm fatigue since upper extremities supported an average of 25% of body weight. This was due to suboptimal hip extension and some undesired recruitment of rectus femoris and sartorius with stimulation of quadriceps electrodes. The left quadriceps exhibited rapid fatigue that limited walking distance and duration. The metabolic energy requirements were well within the aerobic limits of the sedentary paraplegic population. At one-year follow-up evaluation all electrodes are functional except one intramuscular electrode. The implant caused no adverse physiological effects and the individual reported health benefits such as increased energy and overall fitness as a result of the FES system use. With further improvements in muscle response through innovative surgical techniques, the 16-channel implanted FES system can be a viable addition to exercise and mobility function in persons with paraplegia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/86.808942

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epimysial electrodes have proven their suitability in current complex motor prostheses that require coordinated stimulation of several muscles, for example, grasping system for tetraplegics (Freehand System) and standing and walking systems for paraplegics.

    “Epimysial electrodes have proven their suitability in current complex motor prostheses that require coordinated stimulation of several muscles, for example, grasping system for tetraplegics (Freehand System) (Bhadra et al., 2001) and standing and walking systems for paraplegics”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 155

Authors
Kobetic, R., Sharma, M., Triolo, R. J., Uhlir, J. P., Bieri, C., Wibowo, M., Polando, G., Marsolais, E. B., Davis, J. A., & Ferguson, K. A.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
1999-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
390-398
ISSN
  • 1063-6528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0024
OpenAlex
W2130226733
Cited by
155
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
functional electrical stimulation, paraplegia, mobility (physical function), standing and walking, quadriceps stimulation, intramuscular electrodes, muscle fatigue, energy expenditure, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Energy Metabolism, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Orthotic Devices, Paraplegia, Radio Waves, Radiography, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Walkers, Exercise, Walking, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review