The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
Abstract
This paper introduces and motivates the use of Gaussian mixture models (GMM) for robust text-independent speaker identification. The individual Gaussian components of a GMM are shown to represent some general speaker-dependent spectral shapes that are effective for modeling speaker identity. The focus of this work is on applications which require high identification rates using short utterance from unconstrained conversational speech and robustness to degradations produced by transmission over a telephone channel. A complete experimental evaluation of the Gaussian mixture speaker model is conducted on a 49 speaker, conversational telephone speech database. The experiments examine algorithmic issues (initialization, variance limiting, model order selection), spectral variability robustness techniques, large population performance, and comparisons to other speaker modeling techniques (uni-modal Gaussian, VQ codebook, tied Gaussian mixture, and radial basis functions). The Gaussian mixture speaker model attains 96.8% identification accuracy using 5 second clean speech utterances and 80.8% accuracy using 15 second telephone speech utterances with a 49 speaker population and is shown to outperform the other speaker modeling techniques on an identical 16 speaker telephone speech task.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1980.1163420 · Cited by 5,465
Gray, R. M. (1990) · Readings in Speech Recognition · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051584-7.50011-5 · Cited by 2,845
Cited by
Spoofing and countermeasures for speaker verification: A survey
Wu, Z., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Yamagishi, J., Alegre, F., & Li, H. (2015) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.005 · Cited by 601
The ASVspoof 2017 challenge: assessing the limits of replay spoofing attack detection
Kinnunen, T., Sahidullah, M., Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Evans, N., Yamagishi, J., & Lee, K. A. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-1111 · Cited by 535
A review of verbal and non-verbal human–robot interactive communication
Mavridis, N. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.031 · Cited by 453
A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects
Unar, J. A., Seng, W. C., & Abbasi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.01.016 · Cited by 404
Godino-Llorente, J. I., Gomez-Vilda, P., & Blanco-Velasco, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.871883 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, D. A., & Rose, R. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-83
- ISSN
- 1063-6676 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165880886
- Cited by
- 2,860
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/89.365379
- The paper
- Reynolds, D. A., & Rose, R. C. (1995). Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.365379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.