The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Further facts about input to state stabilization
Abstract
Previously published results about input to state stabilizability are shown to hold even for systems which are not linear in controls, provided that a more general type of feedback is allowed. Applications to certain stabilization problems and coprime factorizations, as well as comparisons to other results on input to state stability, are briefly discussed.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization
Sontag, E. D. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.28018 · Cited by 2,717
Self-citationNew characterizations of input-to-state stability
Sontag, E. D., & Wang, Y. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.536498 · Cited by 871
Self-citationConnections between Razumikhin-type theorems and the ISS nonlinear small gain theorem
Teel, A. R. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.701099 · Cited by 451
Robust Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Feedback Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems
Jiang, Y., & Jiang, Z.-P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2294968 · Cited by 414
Yang, Y., Feng, G., & Ren, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2004.824870 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Sontag, E. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-476
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135410088
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further facts about input to state stabilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9.52307
- The paper
- Sontag, E. D. (1990). Further facts about input to state stabilization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.52307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
