The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sliding mode observer for nonlinear uncertain systems
Abstract
A new sliding mode observer for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems is proposed in this article. The proposed sliding mode observer works under much less conservative conditions than previous nonlinear unknown input observers. Also, a functional version of the observer is proposed in certain cases where it may not be possible to design an observer capable of estimating the entire state of the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Lyapunov approach to second-order sliding mode controllers and observers
Moreno, J. A., & Osorio, M. (2008) · 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc.2008.4739356 · Cited by 1,018
Improving Disturbance-Rejection Performance Based on an Equivalent-Input-Disturbance Approach
She, J.-H., Fang, M., Ohyama, Y., Hashimoto, H., & Wu, M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2007.905976 · Cited by 579
Van, M., Ge, S. S., & Ren, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2555307 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, Y., & Saif, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2012-2017
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165082107
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sliding mode observer for nonlinear uncertain systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9.975511
- The paper
- Xiong, Y., & Saif, M. (2001). Sliding mode observer for nonlinear uncertain systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.975511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
