The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Summary cache: a scalable wide-area Web cache sharing protocol
Abstract
The sharing of caches among Web proxies is an important technique to reduce Web traffic and alleviate network bottlenecks. Nevertheless it is not widely deployed due to the overhead of existing protocols. In this paper we demonstrate the benefits of cache sharing, measure the overhead of the existing protocols, and propose a new protocol called "summary cache". In this new protocol, each proxy keeps a summary of the cache directory of each participating proxy, and checks these summaries for potential hits before sending any queries. Two factors contribute to our protocol's low overhead: the summaries are updated only periodically, and the directory representations are very economical, as low as 8 bits per entry. Using trace-driven simulations and a prototype implementation, we show that, compared to existing protocols such as the Internet cache protocol (ICP), summary cache reduces the number of intercache protocol messages by a factor of 25 to 60, reduces the bandwidth consumption by over 50%, eliminates 30% to 95% of the protocol CPU overhead, all while maintaining almost the same cache hit ratios as ICP. Hence summary cache scales to a large number of proxies. (This paper is a revision of Fan et al. 1998; we add more data and analysis in this version.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
Cited by
Cuckoo Filter: Practically Better Than Bloom
Fan, B., Andersen, D. G., Kaminsky, M., & Mitzenmacher, M. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies · doi:10.1145/2674005.2674994 · Cited by 737
Streaming video over the Internet: approaches and directions
Wu, D., Hou, Y. T., Zhu, W., Zhang, Y.-Q., & Peha, J. M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/76.911156 · Cited by 710
Flipping bits in memory without accessing them: An experimental study of DRAM disturbance errors
Kim, Y., Daly, R., Kim, J., Fallin, C., Lee, J. H., Lee, D., Wilkerson, C., Lai, K., & Mutlu, O. (2014) · 2014 ACM/IEEE 41st International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) · doi:10.1109/isca.2014.6853210 · Cited by 465
Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters
Dharmapurikar, S., Krishnamurthy, P., Sproull, T. S., & Lockwood, J. W. (2004) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2004.1268997 · Cited by 435
A Novel Error-Tolerant Anonymous Linking Code
Schnell, R., Bachteler, T., & Reiher, J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3549247 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, L., Cao, P., Almeida, J., & Broder, A. Z.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-293
- ISSN
- 1063-6692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126540423
- Cited by
- 1,811
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Summary cache: a scalable wide-area Web cache sharing protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/90.851975
- The paper
- Fan, L., Cao, P., Almeida, J., & Broder, A. Z. (2000). Summary cache: a scalable wide-area Web cache sharing protocol. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.851975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.