The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters
Abstract
There is a class of packet processing applications that inspect packets deeper than the protocol headers to analyze content. For instance, network security applications must drop packets containing certain malicious Internet worms or computer viruses carried in a packet payload. Content forwarding applications look at the hypertext transport protocol headers and distribute the requests among the servers for load balancing. Packet inspection applications, when deployed at router ports, must operate at wire speeds. With networking speeds doubling every year, it is becoming increasingly difficult for software-based packet monitors to keep up with the line rates. We describe a hardware-based technique using Bloom filters, which can detect strings in streaming data without degrading network throughput. A Bloom filter is a data structure that stores a set of signatures compactly by computing multiple hash functions on each member of the set. This technique queries a database of strings to check for the membership of a particular string. The answer to this query can be false positive but never a false negative. An important property of this data structure is that the computation time involved in performing the query is independent of the number of strings in the database provided the memory used by the data structure scales linearly with the number of strings stored in it. Furthermore, the amount of storage required by the Bloom filter for each string is independent of its length.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rayward-Smith, V. J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1991.155 · Cited by 16,821
Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors
Bloom, B. H. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362686.362692 · Cited by 7,492
Snort - Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks
Roesch, M. (1999) · Cited by 3,163
Summary cache: a scalable wide-area Web cache sharing protocol
Fan, L., Cao, P., Almeida, J., & Broder, A. Z. (2000) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.851975 · Cited by 1,811
Norman, A. C. (2004) · Cited by 247
Towards faster string matching for intrusion detection or exceeding the speed of Snort
Coit, C. J., Staniford, S., & McAlerney, J. (2002) · DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition · doi:10.1109/discex.2001.932231 · Cited by 171
Reprogrammable network packet processing on the field programmable port extender (FPX)
Lockwood, J. W., Naufel, N., Turner, J. S., & Taylor, D. E. (2001) · ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) · doi:10.1145/360276.360304 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Cited by
A survey on deep packet inspection
El-Maghraby, R. T., Abd Elazim, N. M., & Bahaa-Eldin, A. M. (2017) · 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES) · doi:10.1109/icces.2017.8275301 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Dharmapurikar, S., Krishnamurthy, P., Sproull, T. S., & Lockwood, J. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Micro
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-61
- ISSN
- 0272-1732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116967744
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 63.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mm.2004.1268997
- The paper
- Dharmapurikar, S., Krishnamurthy, P., Sproull, T. S., & Lockwood, J. W. (2004). Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters. IEEE Micro. https://doi.org/10.1109/mm.2004.1268997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.