Cited by 18Multi-Criteria Decision MakingFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic

A hybrid novel SWARA-ELECTRE-I method using probabilistic uncertain linguistic information for feature selection in image recognition

Naz, Sumera, Butt, Shariq Aziz, ul Hassan, Muhammad Muneeb, Escorcia-Gutierrez, José, Fatima, Areej, ul Ain, Farhat·2025·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128615

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naz, S., Butt, S. A., ul Hassan, M. M., Escorcia-Gutierrez, J., Fatima, A., & ul Ain, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Education (PK)
  • Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Butt, Shariq Aziz
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
612
Pages
128615
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403471456
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Keywords
feature selection, image recognition, dimensionality reduction, uncertain linguistic information, SWARA, ELECTRE I, multi-attribute group decision making, feature weighting, multi-criteria decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review