The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Capability Maturity Model for Software
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the latest version of the Capability Maturity Model for Software, CMM v1.1. Based on over six years of experience with software process improvement and the contributions of hundreds of reviewers, CMM v1.1 describes the software engineering and management practices that characterize organizations as they mature their processes for developing and maintaining software. This paper stresses the need for a process maturity framework to prioritize improvement actions, describes the process maturity framework of five maturity levels and the associated structural components, and discusses future directions for the CMM. Keywords: capability maturity model, CMM, process maturity framework, software process improvement, process capability, process performance, maturity level, key process area, software process assessment, software capability evaluation. 1 1 Introduction After two decades of unfulfilled promises about productivity and quality gains from applyi...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1,
Bate, R., Kuhn, D., Wells, C., Armitage, J., & Clark, G. (1995) · doi:10.21236/ada303318 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Developing Maturity Models for IT Management: A Procedure Model and its Application
Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5 · Cited by 1,201
Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540410550019 · Cited by 561
A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems
Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002 · Cited by 344
Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648 · Cited by 126
A mapping study on documentation in Continuous Software Development
Theunissen, T., van Heesch, U., & Avgeriou, P. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106733 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Venue
- Software Process Improvement
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W2097700520
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 200.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Capability Maturity Model for Software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9781118156667.ch2
- The paper
- The Capability Maturity Model for Software. (2011). Software Process Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1109/9781118156667.ch2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
